• About Us
  • Publications
    • Submissions To Public Calls
  • Database On Sexual Violence
    • Case Law and Extracts
    • Regulations And Protocols
    • Guidelines, Policies and Best Practices
  • Campaign for Sex based rights
  • Rape Crisis Network
    • Campaign to Verify OSCs
      • WCD Notification regarding OSCs
    • Initiative to Support Survivors

Case Law and Extracts

  • Introduction
Sole Testimony
  • State of Maharashtra v. Chandraprakash Kewalchand Jain
  • Gurmit Singh v. State of Punjab
  • State of Uttar Pradesh v. Pappu alias Yunus and Anr
  • Puran Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh
  • State of Rajasthan v. Babu Meena
  • Vijay @ Chinee v. State of Madhya Pradesh
  • Mohd. Imran Khan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Delay in Filing FIR
  • Introduction
  • State of Uttar Pradesh v. Chhotey Lal
  • Sohan Singh v. State of Bihar
  • Fateh Chand v. State of Haryana
  • Ayub Hussain Mandal v. State of Assam
  • Malkhansingh v. State of MP
Lack of Injuries
  • Introduction
  • Puran Chand vs State Of H.P
  • The Investigating Officer Jowai. Appellant Women Police Station vs Shri Small Phawa.
Prosecutrix Turning Hostile
  • Introduction
  • Shimbhu v. State of Haryana
  • Mohan Lal vs State of Punjab

Regulations And Protocols

On Appropriate Treatment of Victims
  • Advisory mandatory action by Police in cases of crime against women
Instructions Regarding Evidence and Procedure
  • Sections & Guidelines

Guidelines, Policies and Best Practices

Instructions Regarding Evidence and Procedure
  • Model Guidelines under Section 39 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act
On Appropriate Treatment of Victims
  • Guidelines and Examinations
  • A Comprehensive Scheme for Prevention of Trafficking and Rescue, Rehabilitation and Re-integration of victims of Commercial Sexual Exploitation
  • Home
  • Database on Sexual Violence
  • Case Law and Extracts
  • Delay in Filing FIR

Ayub Hussain Mandal v. State of Assam

Table of Contents
  • Citation: (2007) 15 SCC 549

Citation: (2007) 15 SCC 549 #

(Para 7): “As far as delay in lodging the FIR was concerned, the High Court has taken a practical view having regard to the facts of life. The High Court has also pointed out that in cases involving offence of rape, the victims or members of the family of the victim will be hesitant and reluctant to rush to file a complaint as there will be other factors working in their minds, such as the reputation of the family and the career and the future of the victim, particularly if the girl is unmarried. The High Court keeping in view the decisions of this Court in this regard has rightly held that the delay in lodging the FIR was not fatal. It is also observed that no cross-examination was made on the point as to the delay caused in lodging the FIR. The High Court held that the evidence of the prosecutrix i.e. PW 1 in this case was trustworthy and it was acceptable as PW 1 in her evidence has narrated about the entire invident giving all particulars. It should also be kept in mind that the age of th eprosecutrix at the time of the incident was about 10 years.” 

What are your Feelings
Share This Article :
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Fateh Chand v. State of HaryanaMalkhansingh v. State of MP
Table of Contents
  • Citation: (2007) 15 SCC 549

Join our mission. Volunteer, Donate, Advocate.

Get Started Today.

Email: info@womenslivberationindia.org

Call Anytime: (235)-135-6213

Browse Campaigns
Get Involved

Women’s Liberation India

An India-based women’s rights campaign group.

QUICK LINKS

  • Database On Sexual Violence
  • Campaign For Sex Based Rights
  • Initiative For Survivors

SOCIAL MEDIA

  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2023 Women’s Liberation India

Powered By Mandraled Studios